The vocal feminists claim that this is a myth. You only need to look at the females that were used as the mouthpieces of feminism to see that hate for males was encouraged:
Germaine Greer, one of the icons of modern feminism: “As far as I’m concerned, men are the product of a damaged gene.”
Robin Morgan: “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.”
Mary Daly: “There must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males.”
Germaine Greer: “I think that testosterone is a rare poison.”
Or perhaps listen to Brian Simpson:
I’ve been a supply teacher for 20 years in every subject area, K-12 in over two-hundred schools and in over one thousand classrooms in a large Canadian city. I can report that the education system has been taken over by feminists and lesbians who preach a daily diet of hate, violence and discrimination against males despite pretenses of “tolerance” “non violence” and “inclusiveness.”
It’s moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing. Slogans on T-Shirts include: “Stupid Factory: Where Boys are Made;” “BOYS ARE STUPID, THROW ROCKS AT THEM!” … Others include “WHO NEEDS BOYS WHEN YOU HAVE CREDIT CARDS?” and “I LIKE BOYS WHO ARE SENSITIVE AND CRY, WHEN I HIT THEM;” and “… Did you ever notice how all our problems begin with MEN.”
But feminism tends to paint males as agents of the patriarchy who use power and privilege to oppress women. Thus the patriarchy is to be hated and so there is a tendency to hate its agents. Thus, men are the agents of the evil patriarchy. To compound the illogic, feminists tell women to be more like men? It is commonly represented in memes like this:
To take the illogic to the next level, anyone who suggests that men and women are different is guilty of a grave sin as PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi found out when she mentioned some market research that says there are differences in the way men and women consume a bag of Doritos. Apparently, females do not lick their fingers in the same way whilst eating the Doritos. This caused a furor on Twitter. The offending sentence issued by the woman CEO was:
Indra Nooyi: When you eat out of a flex bag — one of our single-serve bags — especially as you watch a lot of the young guys eat the chips, they love their Doritos, and they lick their fingers with great glee, and when they reach the bottom of the bag they pour the little broken pieces into their mouth, because they don’t want to lose that taste of the flavor, and the broken chips in the bottom. Women would love to do the same, but they don’t. They don’t like to crunch too loudly in public. And they don’t lick their fingers generously and they don’t like to pour the little broken pieces and the flavor into their mouth.
So the female feminists are slaying a female CEO. The desire to alter the position of women started with the demand for the vote for women. But it must be remembered that men had not always had the vote. The 1884 Act doubled the size of the electorate from thirty percent to over sixty percent of all adult men. It enfranchised the rural working class. The 1918 Representation of the People Act abolished the property qualification entirely and finally brought in universal suffrage for adult males. Part of the argument was that if young males can go away to be shot, they should be eligible for the vote. I think I’d rather not get shot. Yet women were still not required to go to war. Anyway, it was not the ordinary working man that was preventing women from having the vote as most men did not have the vote anyway. Voting was often tied to the forced draft. Sometimes, those serving in the army got to vote whilst those not, did not. The greatest opponents to votes for women were women themselves.
The vocal feminists have managed to create a false notion that males have mistreated and oppressed women over the centuries to encourage women to hate men. In reality, men revere women. Men enjoy the respect generated by a relationship with a woman. There is nothing in the world more beautiful to a man than a woman. There are so many things to love about women. In dot point form, I list the male list of logical items. But there is more than simplistic male logic.
- They smell amazing.
- The softness of their skin is amazing.
- They have natural maternal instincts.
- They look hot in bikinis.
- They are is caring.
- They are so beautiful to cuddle up to at night.
- They are not afraid to show their emotions.
- They are beautiful to watch when moving. It’s often about the wiggle and the jiggle. We never get bored with watching the jiggle of the breasts or the movement of the hips.
- The look great in anything, even when they are covered in sweat off the playing field. Oh to be covered in girly sweat.
- She listens and gives us her total attention when we talk to her.
- They are smart. They see things that we do not.
- Her pheromones drive us males batshit crazy.
- She is passionate.
A man called Andrew said: “Women are always so soft. I love their stomachs and resting my head on their breasts.”
Just do a search for Percy Sledge – “When a man loves a woman.”
So it is not simple logic why a man loves a woman. It is tied into our very being. Man’s regular logic does not control these items. They are largely controlled from our reptilian brain. Part of woman’s reptilian brain will want the man to stay around for the upbringing of the children. Men are driven to copulate. But men don’t copulate thinking: “Let’s make some babies.” It is much more primal. It is closer to: “Let’s get this laid.” So the relationship is not quite the same as a regular friendship. As one of my rough and ready employees once blurted: “Andy. We wouldn’t talk to them if we could not fuck them.” There is total truth in that although there is a lot of joy in the mental gymnastics played between a male and a female. It adds joy to my everyday.
The above said puts us at a disadvantage when a woman rejects us through hate for males or rejection of communication through rebuttals. As males, we are designed to cooperate with females for the purposes of procreation. Some of this is primal instinct and some is tradition developed to create a civilized society. We are descended from a line of wild animals and those instincts have to be tamed in a civilized society by the upbringing of young boys. Girls need to be trained to be sensitive to boys clumsy advances and boys need to be trained to be respectful to girls. Problems arise if either is damaged. Feminism has broken the sensitivity of females towards the clumsy advances of boys which has damaged boy’s willingness to approach girls. When I was young, a girl was considered to be something exotic with which one could create a beautiful relationship. Copulation would naturally occur in time as the relationship settled. But the copulation was a natural development of shared new experiences. I was chatting with a young male whilst competing in a motorcycle event two weeks ago and I joked: “Wouldn’t it be scary if people could read your mind!” As we move to relationships with girls, he replied: “And what you want to do to them.” That conversation would never have moved to that fifty years ago when I was the same age.
Let us look at the Percy Sledge lyrics for:
When a Man Loves a Woman
When a man loves a woman
Can’t keep his mind on nothing else
He’ll trade the world
For the good thing he’s found
If she’s bad he can’t see it
She can do no wrong
Turn his back on his best friend
If he put her down
When a man loves a woman
Spend his very last dime
Trying to hold on to what he needs
He’d give up all his comfort
Sleep out in the rain
If she said that’s the way it ought to be
Well, this man loves a woman
I gave you everything I had
Trying to hold on to your precious love
Baby, please don’t treat me bad
When a man loves a woman
Down deep in his soul
She can bring him such misery
If she plays him for a fool
He’s the last one to know
Loving eyes can’t ever see
When a man loves a woman
He can do no wrong
He can never own some other girl
Yes when a man loves a woman
I know exactly how he feels
‘Cause baby, baby, baby, you’re my world
When a man loves a woman
(Songwriters: Andrew James Wright / Calvin Houston Lewis.)
In reality, males cannot help but love women. This places us at a disadvantage when criticised by a woman. If she criticises you as an individual, you have to take it on the chin whilst preferably having the graciousness of not denigrating her. We don’t want her hating men even more. If she criticises you by association simply because you are a male, you need to develop tactics for the benefit of the world of manhood. Do not forget that you are not guilty of things that you never did. Because some male cat-whistled some girl ten years ago in another city does not make you guilty of violence against the girl. The male section of the world does not want the women of the world to hate males. We are not talking resurrection of males but a correction of the misdirection. I do not hold each Russian as guilty of the atrocities of the Bolsheviks over one hundred-years-ago and you are not guilty by association for some girl that dislikes male attention and cat-whistles. Cat-whistling is not a sin, it’s intended as a compliment as it is only directed at certain girls, but not at thirty-year-olds.
John Wooden says: “The most important thing in the world is family and love.” You have a part to play in this but a hostile environment has been created. As one singer who is also a dance instructor said to me a couple of days ago whilst standing on my front lawn. He castigated a group of girls for refusing to dance with males and also castigated them for dancing in a group. Feminism is making it hard for doing what males do naturally. Woo women, which means presenting themselves in the best light to see if a girl is interested. The intransigence of girls is making this a painful experience for young inexperienced males. Those that learn to float over the top of this hostility get to bed a lot of one-night-stands. It is called learning ‘game’. But the game is not normal courting, it is overcoming women’s resistance to casual sex. This is not for the benefit of anybody nor for society.
Lionel Suggs is quoted as saying this which illustrates the emotional strength of women against the physical strength of a male. Lionel is referring to the emotional weakness of males when placed against a woman:
“Men have grown embarrassingly weak, but only through observation. Their resolve can easily be broken by a woman. Their emotions can be easily manipulated by a woman. Their power can be easily taken by a woman. Their pride can be easily stripped by a woman. Their entire life can easily be ruined by a woman. While physically stronger, their manipulative prowess can be wittingly outclassed by a woman. And while their dreams are stronger, the realities of women are stronger.”
It is not entirely appropriate but it helps to illustrate the complexities of male strengths against woman’s strengths. Physical strength is of nothing when the adversary is the object of male desire. Thus the devastating effect of turning women against males. Males are vulnerable to the ill effects of lack of affection. The tactic is not new. It was used in the French Revolution, the Bolshevik coup, and the Chinese Cultural Revolution and good historians may find some more instances.
If feminists do hate males, our task is not to fan the fire but to extinguish the hate and turn them back to appreciate the loving affection of males. Under no circumstance fan the flames of feminism. When they demand quotas for employment, tell them they can have all the jobs and pay all the tax. When they say they can’t find a man, say that we should make it compulsory for males to do whatever women want. Test the extremes. Women can earn their own money and men should give them theirs as well. But say it with a smile. Answer with “Whatever you say.”, “Women are never wrong!” Football teams should be all women, army too.
Just never forget that the family unit was the fundamental unit of civilization. Without family, we have no civilization. The attitude of the backers of feminism is summed up by Linda Gordon in 1969:
“The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. … Whatever it’s ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. … “Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests. …”
And Andrea Dworkin bangs the anti-male war drums with:
“Only when manhood is dead – and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it – only then will we know what it is to be free.”
Greg Hallet knuckles in with an item for you to remember:
“Feminism was invented in Russia as a method of war, and during the Cold War feminists in Russia were deported to the west. Feminists break down the family, reduce breeding and create infighting.”
Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse adds this:
“Women’s Liberation, if not the most extreme, then certainly the most influential neo-Marxist movement in America, has done to the American home what communism did to the Russian economy, and most of the ruin is irreversible. By defining between men and women in terms of power and competition instead of reciprocity and co-operation, the movement tore apart the most basic and fragile contract in human society, the unit from which all other social institutions draw their strength.”